I’m going to
write a play. It will be the third play I've written and it will be the best one yet.
I just finished the second book by Stanislavsky and have a glimmer of
understanding of what is necessary for acting in a play.
There are
three basic elements in a play that an actor has to incorporate into creating
his role and two of these are supplied by the playwright. One is the Super Objective and the other is
the Through Line of Action.
A play
created without these in the playwright’s mind leaves it up to the actor to
supply them and work with them. There
is, however, a problem with this in that the actors may have a different
interpretations.
It is the
job of the director to make the final judgements on these two elements and make
sure that all of the intermediate activities of the play follow the Through
Line of Action and fulfill the Super Objective.
This would be true whether or not the playwright made it clear.
The next big
job of the playwright is to write the dialogue of the play. In order to be accepted for production, this
has to be real; it has to be genuine to the Super Objective of the play and
allow it to be achieved, no matter in how circuitous a manner.
The Super Objective of Our Town was to illustrate life, living, and dying. The Through Line of Action was the life and death experiences of two families. There it is, as simple as that and yet profound.
Then there
was a great variety of things that transpired on stage. They ranged from the important to the mundane
but each added to the achievement of the Super Objective of the play. There was nothing superfluous in the script.
The two
plays that I’ve written were done so without a full understanding of these
requirements. Yet when I reflect on one
of them, Duplicity, I can see that there is a Super Objective and a Through Line
of Action as well as a variety of situations that support them. It can be rewritten to make them clearer. Looking back on the play, I can see that it
has promise.
This is
where one of the major bugaboos of my psyche gets in the way. I see it but does anyone else? How do I go about getting someone to take the
time to work on it with me? Whom do I
ask? Will he/she tell me the truth? Will they be able to suggest changes to make
it better? I dunno.
This is
where I am in life. I don’t seem to have
the ability to ask for help and get it.
A friend read it, said it was good but that isn’t for what I was
looking. I need someone who will take
the time to read it, understand it, and then work with me to first of all make
it worth producing and secondly give me the confidence I need to propose it to
a theater company.
There is one
production company for which I have been in eight different plays. This company has a process that they use for
the development of a play that they may produce. There is, associated with this company, a playwright
with whom I am acquainted on a professional basis and she said she would be
happy to.
Duplicity
may be a worthy candidate for rewrite into a murder-mystery and be seen all the
way through to the stage. On the other hand,
it may be better to conceive a whole new play and go through the development
process with them on that. Then use the experience
of that to develop Duplicity into its own production.
I am more
favorably disposed to the latter strategy.
Mainly because Duplicity is a story that needs to be told and in it
nobody is murdered or dies. The theme of
it is the current self-centered philosophy of the Millennial generation, “you only live
once,” and how that can run amok. It
would be taking the easy way out to rewrite it for a murder-mystery.
There it is,
an answer to my first decision. Write a play
for the murder –mystery stage and make it a new and different plot.
There is
still the artistic requirement that it have a Super Objective and Through Line
Action. This is self-imposed because
from what I’ve seen of these plays it isn’t always in the mind of the
playwright when it is written.
A further requirement is that it have supporting objectives, situations, dialogues and characters that advance the Super Objective and do it along the Through Line of Action with enough complexity that the audience is involved with the characters and sub plots in an interesting love-hate relationship.
A further requirement is that it have supporting objectives, situations, dialogues and characters that advance the Super Objective and do it along the Through Line of Action with enough complexity that the audience is involved with the characters and sub plots in an interesting love-hate relationship.
There are
many possibilities to realize these objectives.
It is now up to me to decide which one to use. It will be a new and different approach for
me but one that may yield surprisingly good results.
My goal is to write a murder-mystery that gets produced on the local stage in the 2017-18 season. My main objective now is to decide on the Super Objective and the plot that will achieve it. This is not going to be a quick process and I may run a few of these plots before my friends to see what they think of them.
My goal is to write a murder-mystery that gets produced on the local stage in the 2017-18 season. My main objective now is to decide on the Super Objective and the plot that will achieve it. This is not going to be a quick process and I may run a few of these plots before my friends to see what they think of them.
Writing the
plots will be a good exercise in creativity but I must decide on a Super
Objective first, then come up with a plot that will support it. This may be after trying out many plots,
which are possible for achieving a Super Objective. There are many streets one may take to reach
a certain address.
This is the
first installment in my quest to write a play.